June 01, 2009

Burden

Historic has been used to describe the election of Barack Obama. What do cancer and Barack Obama have in common? A diagnosis of cancer is devastating to anyone unfortunate enough to be afflicted. The election of Barack Obama is also a devastating affliction to anyone who currently resides in the United States.
 
Barack Obama nominated Sonia Sotomayor to fill the seat vacated on the Supreme Court.  Obama nominated her to advance his agenda. There were only two qualifications necessary in Obama’s eyes. Sharing the same philosophy and being a Hispanic sealed the deal for Sotomayor. No other qualifications were required. Now Obama and his minions could praise her as the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice.
 
Obama refers to the constitution as negative liberties. I can guarantee Sotomayor shares the exact same viewpoint. Sotomayor is obviously not a constitutionalist. In fact she believes sympathy and empathy should play a role in Supreme Court decisions. Any nominee for the Supreme Court who basis court decisions on sympathy and empathy has already proven unqualified.
 
New Haven Connecticut rejected the results of a 2003 firefighter-promotion test because Caucasians outscored African Americans and Hispanics. Why? City officials feared lawsuits from minorities claiming a bias. Of course Sotomayor endorsed disregarding the firefighter-promotion test.
 
Sotomayor is not only unqualified but a racist. Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich are correct in their criticism. I don’t know if you brain dead liberals are aware of this, but Caucasians can be victims of racism. Often referred to as reverse racism.  But how often is racism against Caucasians made an issue by liberal Democrats? Never.
 
Isn’t it strange how superior Caucasians are compared to minorities? If you take the philosophy of liberal Democrats you would get the impression minorities are a helpless bunch in need of protection and handicaps.  All this talk about sympathy and empathy demonstrates how minorities are pathetic compared to Caucasians. Do Caucasians need affirmative action? Are Caucasians out seeking sympathy and empathy? Unfortunately the circumstances under which Sotomayor was nominated present what would be called an ugly truth.
 
Race is irrelevant in my eyes. If I’m an employer and I’m interviewing candidates for a position I will select the candidate with the most credentials regardless of race. Affirmative action promotes equal opportunity but obtaining a position of employment should not be based on equality. It should be based on ability to perform the tasks required.
 
Imagine Sotomayor was a Caucasian male but has the same so-called qualifications. Would Obama still nominate Sotomayor to the Supreme Court? Not a chance in hell.
 
Obama based his Supreme Court decisions on ideology and identity politics. Qualifications disregarded.
 
Should Sonia Sotomayor be confirmed? No. Will Sonia Sotomayor be confirmed? No doubt. Republicans are cowards on the issue and won’t even attempt to fight this nomination. Even if Republicans chose to fight this nomination and actually criticized her judicial record, she would still be confirmed due to the overwhelming amount of liberals in the Senate. Republicans should fight Democrats to the end on this nomination regardless. The Republican Party needs to be the opposition. Not attempting to be a less extreme version of the Democrat Party.
 
These are some scary times in America and as Obama said we haven’t seen anything yet.

Posted by Matthew Slater at 07:13 PM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

August 03, 2008

Frighteningly Irresponsible

The 2008 presidential election campaign may go down as the scariest election in American history. The inept frontrunners during the primaries and caucuses for the Democrats both shared socialistic policies. Sharing the belief that a large interventionist government was the answer to all our problems. If you have a problem the government would be there to solve it. We are the government and we are here to help.

A portion of the voting population voted based on a particular candidates gender and race. A portion of women voted for Clinton because she has a vagina (I would assume she does but I cannot be certain.) and a portion of African Americans voted for Obama because his skin color resembles there's.

Obama is already turning his campaign into a racial statement. In essence Obama is attempting to give the impression that if you do not vote for Obama you are a racist. It's not that you don't agree with Obama on policy. You just cannot tolerate even the thought of a black man becoming president. You are nothing short of a goddamn bigot! This is the perception that the Obama campaign would like to create.

Speaking of race. The House of Representatives voted this week to apologize for slavery. What an utter waste of time and a disgusting display of irrelevance. What happened then is in the past. We live in a different time. Everyone in this country is free to pursue any goal desired regardless of race. Race is no longer a barrier in the United States. To be foolish enough to even consider such a ridiculous proposal is in the realm of retardation. To anyone who would want to waste our time with such nonsense, fuck you.

Obama frightens me. Is it because he is an African American? Absolutely not, if Obama were campaigning as a conservative whose goal was to reduce government intervention in the lives of Americans, I would vote for him. If he dismissed global warming as nothing more then a religion, he would gain my support. If Obama began promoting individual liberty and self-reliance, I would applaud and support him. Also his supporting casts of despicable pastors and goddamn America idiots would have to go away too.

I despise him because he is a Marxist. His goal is to have everyone become a slave to the state. The government will do this, that and the other for you but all your liberty is gone. You are a slave to the government. Without the government you are nothing. This is the type of society Obama would like to create.

It is frightening that Obama threatens to install a windfall profit tax on profitable oil companies. The latest example is the Exxon Mobil Corporation. Exxon Mobil reported second-quarter earnings of $11.68 billion. This is biggest profit from operations ever by any United States corporation. I'm sure this news infuriates liberals and Marxists. I would have been enthrathed by this news if their stock price wasn't on such a decline but profiting in business does not bother me. The liberal and Marxist types believe Obama is dead on and he should redistribute wealth like the good Marxist he is.

The sick mentality of if I'm not wealthy no one else should be wealthy has to stop. Life isn't fair. You brain-dead liberals are going to have to face facts. Maybe your mental disability prevents you from doing so but just because your financial situation is pathetic doesn't mean everyone else's should be.

I am so sick and tired of hearing the sob stories. Here is an example of one that is really on my nerves. I don't give a shit that you cannot afford your house. How about buying a house that is more easily affordable. Now is the best time to buy but some people are stupid about it.

Don't buy a home you know you cannot afford!

If you buy a house you cannot afford, you deserve to lose your home. It really is that simple. I don't feel sorry for you regardless of your situation because you got what you deserved.

But wait a minute! The compassionate liberals are here to help! President Bush signed a bill to bailout homeowners who cannot afford their current homes. So irresponsibility wins again. If you actually think for just a second, this bailout will help just as much as the stimulus package, Not at all. In reality all this will do is prolong the inevitable. You will eventually lose your home in the end because the fact of the matter is you bought a home you could not afford. Good riddance.

I have to retract the statement I made supporting Bob Barr in my previous piece. I can no longer even consider voting for Barr because he is a believer in the religion known as man made global warming. I know that all three are believers in this hoax but I was intending on voting for Barr based on his message of small government. The message of small government is no longer valid when you praise Al Gore's work on climate change. McCain's claim of small government is invalidated as well by his belief in this religion.

I know Barr had no chance in hell of winning but it would have been a vote against a liberal Republican without actually voting for a Democrat, Which I would never do. I threatened to vote for Obama in complete anger at McCain but I could never do it. Under no circumstances will I actually cast a vote for a Marxist. Will I help pave the way for a Marxist to win? Maybe. Not voting for McCain is in essence electing a Marxist but I am not going to vote based on the lesser of two evils. I'd be very cautious about voting for the lesser of two evils. I know many who are voting for McCain just to vote against Obama but I can grantee you there will be little difference in the McCain and Obama policies here in the United States.

Vice presidents are being highly talked about lately. It has been said that Mitt Romney is atop McCain's list of vice president potentials. If I actually supported McCain I would applaud such a choice. Mitt Romney would make a far better president then McCain, so obviously Romney as vice president is a plus. But McCain's presidency if it comes to be, will be nothing short of disastrous for the conservative base and the country. I would assume that McCain's vice president would want to run for president once McCain's term is finished. Maybe two terms. But why would conservatives vote for the vice president of a big government Republican in the next election? Especially after seeing how disastrous of a president McCain was.

There is a rumor McCain could choose Joe Lieberman as his vice president. You then would have two liberals running under the Republican banner. I want McCain to be defeated so badly that I hope he does choose Lieberman. Such a choice would destroy McCain's campaign. The reluctant support he is receiving from some conservatives will vanish entirely. Many conservatives are waiting to see who his vice president will be before making a decision on whether they will vote for him or not. This will be the biggest decision of McCain's campaign. McCain is a big government Republican and will go right along with the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. Actually McCain has openly stated he will work with Nancy Pelosi. Nancy Pelosi is nothing short of a socialistic cunt. I refuse to support someone of that ilk and I can guarantee I'm not alone.

Posted by Matthew Slater at 11:17 AM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

June 27, 2008

Accommodations

One complaint I have with America is we are too accommodating. Too accommodating as far as foreign languages are concerned. Attempting to accommodate everyone never has any positive effects. The liberals attempt to accommodate everyone with there socialistic ideas and it is frightening. On that note, is it just my insensitive logic or is it absolutely terrifying that we attempt to accommodate foreign languages?

I believe English should be the official language of the United States. The system should be setup so that if you cannot read, write, or speak English you are absolutely useless in American society. Instead we cater to foreign languages. When you call an American corporation for customer service I should not hear press one for English and two for Spanish. Also I should not be greeted in English and then in Spanish. The concept is nonsense. All Americans should be able to read, write and speak English. No exceptions!

If you continually cater to Spanish people who speak strictly Spanish they have no incentive to learn English. Learning English should not be an option it should be mandatory and without complete understanding of the English language you should not be able to obtain a job, open a bank account, or be part of anything America has to offer. You should in essence be exiled.

I support immigration from other countries and respect foreigners to the fullest extent. My simple request is learn the English language.

College is not only a liberal indoctrination center but it is also a joke. Any college that mandates taking a secondary language is absurd. This is part of the problem. Many people in America have barely mastered the English language but yet there expected to take two years of another langue. It is absolute bullshit.

Under no circumstances am I interested in learning a second language. Nor will I. In high school one of my courses was Spanish One. I did not pay the slightest attention to anything. I failed just about every test out of carelessness and refused to give a damn about another language. Once I handed in a test completely blank because I didn't have the slightest idea and was damn proud of it.  Ironically after failing just about every test and paying no attention, I still passed the class with a D. That is public education at its finest.

Newt Gingrich was a big supporter of making English the official language of the United States. I applauded him every step of the way on this issue. Lately though Newt is leaning more and more to the left. I respect the man but lately he is making me sick. It was pathetic to see him and Nancy Pelosi in commercial aimed at promoting the fight against climate change.

Just recently Newt Gingrich did an interview with Greta Van Susteren on FOX News. Newt said that McCain is much more conservative than the news media maverick image he receives. Newt also claims if you look at McCain's voting record he has voted conservative four times out of five.

Apparently McCain is such a conservative that he cosponsored a bill that would grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens. In all of McCain's conservatism he is in favor of a carbon cap and trade system. How conservative was it to be a part of the gang of fourteen? McCain opposed the Bush tax cuts twice. In 2004 he talked to John Kerry about becoming his vice president. Quite the conservative we have here. I can go on and on. McCain is not conservative. He is a Republican in name only. Never mind a conservative. Most of his views would be accepted on the left. McCain's stance on Iraq is what prevents him from being a full-fledged over the hill liberal.

McCain should be himself and leave the Republican Party after he loses the election. Become an Independent or a Democrat because quite frankly many others and I cannot stand him. I want the Republican Party to succeed under a conservative leader not be destroyed by a moderate liberal. I am as much against McCain as I am Obama. In some cases more so against McCain, he is a member of the party that once in awhile produces conservative candidates. The Democrats on the other hand are a useless bunch and Obama is just one of many brain-dead liberals who make up that party. I will never consider voting for such detestable people. The Republicans have a future with solid conservatives as members of the party. Electing McCain though will send us inthe wrong direction as a party.  Electing either McCain or Obama will send us in the wrong direction as a country because they both suck.

My support right now goes to Bob Barr who is representing the Libertarian Party. He may have no chance of winning but at least I could respect myself casting a vote for him.  If I vote for McCain or Obama I'd have to consider shooting myself the day after the election. I would be guilty of committing a crime against America. The damage Obama or McCain would inflict on America would have me guilt ridden knowing I voted for one of these imbeciles. As Rush Limbaugh has said "we are so screwed."

Posted by Matthew Slater at 11:21 AM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

June 26, 2008

Detrimental Mentalities

The other day I came across an article I wish I had not come across. It greatly infuriated me. The title of the article was "You don't still use a screen saver, do you?" Which sounds like it would be a technical article. Maybe something about screen savers that affects the performance of a computer or something worthwhile. But oh no was I wrong.

Before even reading the article I noticed the heading of the web page said "Yahoo! Green." Which put me off immediately. Unfortunately it was only the beginning.  In the actual article Don Willmott spews his insanity of reducing carbon dioxide. His whole purgative is you should not have a screen saver on your computer because when you are not using your computer it should be completely off. He also claims an Australian phone company cut tons of carbon dioxide by removing screensavers from 36,000 office computers. This is how someone of such a screwed up mindset thinks.

To put it bluntly screw you Don Willmott and the rest of your green ideologies. This whole green movement is nothing more then a scam to control you. You must do this, that, and the other in the name of the environment. Fuck the environment! I live in the United States of America and as a citizen I have the right to leave my computer on for 72 hours and only actually use it for three hours if I choose. No environmental whacko is going to instruct me on how to run my life.

Congress has bought into this hoax and has even passed legislation in the name of it. In December 2007 these maroons passed legislation banning incandescent light bulbs. This legislation calls for a phase out of 100-watt bulbs in 2012 and in 2014 the phase out 40-watt bulbs. Which will leave us with compact fluorescent light bulbs. Oh by the way they contain mercury. Absolute mindlessness.

Do not buy this horseshit. England has already been through this nonsense, Increased taxes and regulation all in the name of the environment. What has it accomplished? Nothing. Both Barrack Obama and John McCain want to take us in the same direction. In the end it will have no positive effects. 

The way John McCain has embraced this whole green movement makes him absolutely unelectable.  I cannot vote for anyone who buys this nonsense. Let alone promotes it! I have a lot of problems with John McCain in general. He is a considerably flawed candidate but it infuriates me that people who claim to be conservatives are ready to vote for him. They all bring up judges. I'll say it again, it is not going to matter who John McCain nominates if the number of liberals in the Senate remains the same or increases. John McCain in the end will either nominate nobody or cut a deal with the Democrats and nominate a moderate liberal for the Supreme Court. The majority of nominees to the Supreme Court have been by Republican presidents lately. Just because you elect a Republican does not mean you will get a conservative on the bench. So all you who use Supreme Court nominations as an argument to support McCain just know it is an invalid argument. 

Will it really feel like a victory if McCain wins or will it feel like we received the lesser of two evils? Instead of a Marxist we get a moderate liberal. Just fantastic!  Which is exactly why I am not voting for president. Anyone of the Republican nominees except McCain had my vote. Mike Huckabee was borderline but I may have held my nose and voted for him. Thompson, Romney, and Giuliani all had my vote. Giuliani was more moderate because of his stance on the social issues but he was a million times better then John McCain. At least Giuliani was strong on many key issues. I've heard conservatives rip Giuliani like he is to far to the left but yet they embrace McCain with open arms. Go fuck yourselves! 

After discussing Supreme Court nominations it makes sense to discuss some current Supreme Court rulings. The latest Supreme Court decision invalidated a District of Columbia handgun ban. A decision I applaud because it upheld our second amendment rights. But on Wednesday the Supreme Court made a terrible ruling. The Supreme Court has ruled by a 5-4 vote that a Louisiana law that permits the execution of a scumbag whom was convicted of raping his 8-year-old stepdaughter violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The man who committed this act deserves to be killed. No two ways about it. This girl is going to be tormented the rest of her life because of disgraces like this guy. I truly hope this man is killed somehow. He doesn't deserve to live another second. Activists' judges are a serious problem. They are not applying the Constitution they are using partisan biases to make determinations. It really is disgusting.

I hear Rush Limbaugh deliver high praises to Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal and now I can see why. Bobby Jindal signed a bill authorizing castration of sexual offenders. They with either be chemically castrated or physically castrated. After being castrated they will serve there prison time as well. Brilliant! I love this guy. I see why conservatives are praising him. We should be nominating people like him to be our nominee not liberal idiots like John McCain. If we cannot kill sex offenders let at least make there lives miserable. Big applause for Governor Bobby Jindal!

I hope Jindal doesn't end up as McCain's vice-president as many speculate because that would ruin one of the better conservatives out there. This guy has a bright future and he does not need to be destroyed by being the vice-president of a liberal candidate.

Finally, I have an idea to help contribute to reducing the carbon footprint made by Americans. Al Gore and James Hansen could be heralded as environmental heroes if they would commit to the following. Maybe all you environmental idiots should commit suicide. Do it for the environment! With your logic this action will greatly reduce carbon dioxide. If turning off your computer monitor has such a positive impact just imagine how the death of all environmental idiots would impact the environment. Once you maroons are dead there will be less people exhaling this terrible pollutant known as carbon dioxide. Nor bother the sane with insanity. Would the world be so perfect?

Posted by Matthew Slater at 11:29 AM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

June 12, 2008

Atrocities

The Supreme Court ruled that the 270 foreign terror suspects have the right under the United States Constitution to challenge their detention in civilian courts. Now terror suspects will be able to receive a lawyer and will enter our corrupt court system. The end result of this ruling will produce a scenario were many of these terror suspects are eventually released. Activist Supreme Court Justices continue inflict their misery upon the United States.

McCain and Obama will be pleased that there is no longer a need for a Guantanamo Bay. Guantanamo Bay was created to avoid this exact scenario. Terrorists at Guantanamo Bay are held captive specifically to be integrated and prevented from killing anymore of our soldiers or citizens. We attempt to gain as much information possible from these creeps to prevent future attacks and casualties. Since when is an enemy bestowed the privilege of access to our civilian court system? I'm warning you liberals support our enemies more then they do our own men and women fighting for us. Liberals refuse to fund our military without loading the bill with horseshit but yet are determined to be an accomplice to our enemy.  What the fuck is that? 

Unfortunately many brain-dead liberals enthusiastically support this ruling. Granting terrorists the right to challenge their detention in civilian courts is justified in their eyes. I will never understand liberal rational. It is completely irrational to grant our enemy (remember we are fighting a war against these people) access to our civilian court system. These are the same people who are out to destroy America and its citizens. Yet liberals cannot help but to be compassionate. Compassionate liberals succeed in giving comfort and support to our enemy while simultaneously undermining our effort to defeat terrorism. It is a goddamn disgrace. 

Many claim it is unjust to imprison terrorists without due process. If a United States citizen committed a crime in New York they would be entitled by law to a trail. This does not apply to terrorists who we are fighting our armed forces overseas!  I do not know what is happening to the minds of people who believe terrorists deserve a date in our civilian courts. To be this illogical you have to be either uninformed or a liberal. Never put stupidity by a liberal. I cannot stress that enough. Liberalism is the philosophy of the stupid. It is proven every time these brain-dead blockheads attempt to accomplish any portion of their radical agenda.

Liberals desire to comfort terrorists.  Assure our enemy they will be treated with the utmost respect.  Treating each and every terror suspect as if they were American citizens. Actually they would prefer a terrorist receive better treatment then an American citizen. Liberals see no difference between a man who was arrested on a DWI and a terrorist attempting to kill Americans on the battlefield.  I personally would like to see all 270 terror suspects be shot and killed. No questions asked. All that would remain is 270 useless dead bodies. Because death is exactly what terrorists deserve.

Now to inject some humor into an overall depressing piece, my previous post highlighted recent gaffes made by Obama. He literally has become the human gaffe machine. I'm sure everyone has heard this one by now but below is a gaffe by Obama during a Memorial Day ceremony.  I find it to be hilarious. Just blackout the thought this man could be our next president because that will take the humor out of it. 

Listen

Posted by Matthew Slater at 11:42 AM | | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)